linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Enable HSD131, HSM142, HSW131, BDM48, and HSM142

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:04:34 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Krupp <centos@....yagii.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Enable HSD131, HSM142, HSW131, BDM48, and HSM142

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Sorry.  I missed this question, but I really don't understand the question.
> Alexander posted a patch in a kernel bugzilla @ Red Hat and I modified the patch
> with some additional changes.  I don't want him to lose credit for the work so
> he's got a proper Signed-off-by tag for this patch.

This is not how this is expressed. Either you write that in free text in
the commit message or you use Co-developed-by. More details in

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette