[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5d61822-c4fa-d5d3-c3ef-174b57a651bc@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:45:04 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: support.opensource@...semi.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, stwiss.opensource@...semi.com,
Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: da9062: add power management ops
On 2/6/20 1:00 AM, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 20-01-23 12:51, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
>>> Disable the watchdog during suspend if it is enabled and re-enable it on
>>> resume. So we can sleep without the interruptions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> I got an kbuild email so I checked the linux-next master tree. On
> linux-next this patch isn't used instead the old v1 was used...
>
Yes, it appears that I picked the wrong version as well, and Wim picked it
up from there. But, really, what do you expect if you don't tag your
submissions with version numbers ?
I would suggest to send a follow-up patch to fix what is in -next.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists