[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200206163019.CCE0E214AF@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:30:18 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the devicetree-fixes tree
Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2020-02-05 13:34:18)
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got conflicts in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8998-gpucc.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-videocc.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 04dbd86539fd ("dt-bindings: Fix paths in schema $id fields")
>
> from the devicetree-fixes tree and commits:
>
> e6747e24f15d ("dt-bindings: clock: Fix qcom,gpucc bindings for sdm845/sc7180/msm8998")
> 8cff43d46cfc ("dt-bindings: clock: Cleanup qcom,videocc bindings for sdm845/sc7180")
>
> from the clk tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter changes seem to have included the former,
> plus I removed Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml)
> and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks Stephen. Rob, you may want to drop the change to qcom,gpucc.yaml
so that conflicts are reduced.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists