[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1581012329.5585.439.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:05:29 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nayna@...ux.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ima: Implement support for uncompressed module
appended signatures
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 11:42 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> Currently IMA can validate compressed modules containing appended
> signatures. This adds the ability to also validate uncompressed
> modules when appraise_type=imasig|modsig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Your patch description in no way matches the code.
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/digsig.c | 9 +++++++--
> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 3 +++
> security/integrity/integrity.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c
> index ea1aae3d07b3..5e0c4d04ab9d 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/key-type.h>
> #include <linux/digsig.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/verification.h>
> #include <crypto/public_key.h>
> #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
>
> @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ static const char * const keyring_name[INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX] = {
> ".ima",
> #endif
> ".platform",
> + ".builtin_trusted_keys",
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY
> @@ -45,8 +47,11 @@ static struct key *integrity_keyring_from_id(const unsigned int id)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> if (!keyring[id]) {
> - keyring[id] =
> - request_key(&key_type_keyring, keyring_name[id], NULL);
> + if (id == INTEGRITY_KEYRING_KERNEL)
> + keyring[id] = VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING;
> + else
> + keyring[id] = request_key(&key_type_keyring,
> + keyring_name[id], NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(keyring[id])) {
> int err = PTR_ERR(keyring[id]);
> pr_err("no %s keyring: %d\n", keyring_name[id], err);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 300c8d2943c5..4c009c55d620 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ static int modsig_verify(enum ima_hooks func, const struct modsig *modsig,
> func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK)
> rc = integrity_modsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM,
> modsig);
> + if (rc && func == MODULE_CHECK)
> + rc = integrity_modsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_KERNEL, modsig);
> +
> if (rc) {
> *cause = "invalid-signature";
> *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> index 73fc286834d7..63f0e6bff0e0 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ int integrity_kernel_read(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
> #define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_EVM 0
> #define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA 1
> #define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM 2
> -#define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX 3
> +#define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_KERNEL 3
> +#define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX 4
>
> extern struct dentry *integrity_dir;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists