[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200206190641.GA700495@xz-x1>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:06:41 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/19] KVM: Clean up local variable usage in
__kvm_set_memory_region()
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:31:52PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1101,52 +1099,55 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> if (mem->guest_phys_addr + mem->memory_size < mem->guest_phys_addr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - slot = id_to_memslot(__kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), id);
> - base_gfn = mem->guest_phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - npages = mem->memory_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -
> - if (npages > KVM_MEM_MAX_NR_PAGES)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> /*
> * Make a full copy of the old memslot, the pointer will become stale
> * when the memslots are re-sorted by update_memslots().
> */
> - old = *slot;
> + tmp = id_to_memslot(__kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), id);
> + old = *tmp;
> + tmp = NULL;
Shall we keep this chunk to the patch where it will be used? Other
than that, it looks good to me.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists