[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U5YNe5ODREBMcxSfhih8O48kwD_t+apAFD391Oekmkcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:32:51 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genirq: Clarify that irq wake state is orthogonal to enable/disable
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:15 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> There's some confusion around if an irq that's disabled with
> disable_irq() can still wake the system from sleep states such as
> "suspend to RAM". Let's clarify this in the kernel documentation for
> irq_set_irq_wake() so that it's clear that an irq can be disabled and
> still wake the system if it has been marked for wakeup.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes from v1:
> * Added the last sentence from tglx
>
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
FWIW this mathes my understanding and in the past I've done work to
'drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c' making it support this exact
thing. Thanks for documenting.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists