lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:20:05 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elver@...gle.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
        ira.weiny@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jack@...e.cz,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] mm: mark an intentional data race in
 page_zonenum

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:30:00PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> Both the read and write are done only with the non-exclusive mmap_sem
> held. Since the read only check for a specific bit range (up to 3 bits)
> in the flag but the write here never change those 3 bits, so load
> tearing would be harmless here. Thus, just mark it as an intentional
> data races using the data_race() macro which is designed for those
> situations [1].

This changelog makes me think you don't really understand the situation.

A page never changes its zone number.  The zone number happens to be
stored in the same word as other bits which are modified, but the zone
number bits will never be modified by any other write.  So we can accept
a reload of the zone bits after an intervening write and we don't need
to use READ_ONCE().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ