linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] dt-bindings: spi: spi-nxp-fspi: Add support for imx8mm, imx8qxp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:40:30 +0000
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@...il.com>,
        Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] dt-bindings: spi: spi-nxp-fspi: Add support for
 imx8mm, imx8qxp

On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:59:49AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> Add support for nxp,imx8qxp-fspi and nxp,imx8mm-fspi do the bindings

s/do/to/

> document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> ---
> V2: No change
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
> index 2cd67eb727d4..7ac60d9fe357 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
>  
>  Required properties:
>    - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
> +			    "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
> +			    "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"

All 3 are different and no compatibility?

> +
>    - reg :        First contains the register location and length,
>                   Second contains the memory mapping address and length
>    - reg-names :  Should contain the resource reg names:
> -- 
> 2.24.0
>