linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm6150 and pm6150l

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:29:57 +0530
From:   kgunda@...eaurora.org
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm6150 and
 pm6150l

On 2020-02-07 00:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Kiran Gunda (2020-02-06 05:55:27)
>> Add the compatibles and PMIC ids for pm6150 and pm6150l PMICs
>> found on SC7180 based platforms
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 2 ++
>>  drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c                              | 4 ++++
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
>> index affc169..36f0795 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ properties:
>>        - qcom,pm8998
>>        - qcom,pmi8998
>>        - qcom,pm8005
>> +      - qcom,pm6150
>> +      - qcom,pm6150l
>>        - qcom,spmi-pmic
> 
> Maybe the yaml binding needs to say this is sorted in subtype id in a
> comment.
> 
> 	# Sorted based on subtype ID the device reports
> 
Ok.. I will add it in next post.
> Or we should sort this list in the binding and sort the compatible
> string table in the driver with a comment that it's sorted based on
> subtype id.
> 
>> 
>>    reg:
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c 
>> b/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
>> index 1df1a27..5bfeec8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
>>  #define PM8998_SUBTYPE         0x14
>>  #define PMI8998_SUBTYPE                0x15
>>  #define PM8005_SUBTYPE         0x18
>> +#define PM6150L_SUBTYPE                0x1F
>> +#define PM6150_SUBTYPE         0x28
>> 
>>  static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic", .data = (void 
>> *)COMMON_SUBTYPE },
>> @@ -57,6 +59,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,pm8998",    .data = (void 
>> *)PM8998_SUBTYPE },
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998",   .data = (void 
>> *)PMI8998_SUBTYPE },
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,pm8005",    .data = (void 
>> *)PM8005_SUBTYPE },
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,pm6150l",   .data = (void 
>> *)PM6150L_SUBTYPE },
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,pm6150",    .data = (void 
>> *)PM6150_SUBTYPE },
>>         { }
>>  };