lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200207065103.o5liyfdrl5fudxvh@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:51:03 +0100
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     support.opensource@...semi.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, stwiss.opensource@...semi.com,
        Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: da9062: add power management ops

On 20-02-06 06:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/6/20 1:00 AM, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > On 20-01-23 12:51, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > Disable the watchdog during suspend if it is enabled and re-enable it on
> > > > resume. So we can sleep without the interruptions.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > 
> > I got an kbuild email so I checked the linux-next master tree. On
> > linux-next this patch isn't used instead the old v1 was used...
> > 
> 
> Yes, it appears that I picked the wrong version as well, and Wim picked it
> up from there. But, really, what do you expect if you don't tag your
> submissions with version numbers ?

Pls check the cover-letter I said sorry their. As I said it was a
mistake.

> I would suggest to send a follow-up patch to fix what is in -next.

A 'real' patch or should I send a 'fixup!' patch?

Regards,
  Marco

> Guenter
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ