linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct instead of virtual address to pfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200207105135.cl2kelkrqlift273@master>
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:51:35 +0000
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct
 instead of virtual address to pfn

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:19:46PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:17 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> memmap should be the physical address to page struct instead of virtual
>> address to pfn.
>>
>> Since we call this only for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, pfn_to_page() is valid at
>> this point.
>>
>> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index b5da121bdd6e..56816f653588 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>>         /* Align memmap to section boundary in the subsection case */
>>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) &&
>>                 section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) != start_pfn)
>> -               memmap = pfn_to_kaddr(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
>> +               memmap = pfn_to_page(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
>
>Yes, this looks obviously correct. This might be tripping up
>makedumpfile. Do you see any practical effects of this bug? The kernel
>mostly avoids ->section_mem_map in the vmemmap case and in the
>!vmemmap case section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) should always equal
>start_pfn.

To summarize:

 * vmemmap, ->section_mem_map is not used mostly
 * !vmemmap, we are sure range is section aligned

Sounds we don't need to handle this?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me