[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hLW5Ww1Bo0MmNi8fzUNQEvudtWpGOK23MWaiqQ+MemfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:06:54 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sparsemem: avoid memmap overwrite for non-SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:17 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> In case of SPARSEMEM, populate_section_memmap() would allocate memmap
> for the whole section, even we just want a sub-section. This would lead
> to memmap overwrite if we a sub-section to an already populated section.
>
> Just return the populated memmap for non-SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP case.
>
> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> ---
> mm/sparse.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 56816f653588..c75ca40db513 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,16 @@ static struct page * __meminit section_activate(int nid, unsigned long pfn,
> if (nr_pages < PAGES_PER_SECTION && early_section(ms))
> return pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> + /*
> + * If it is not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we always populate memmap for the
> + * whole section, even for a sub-section.
> + *
> + * Return its memmap if already populated to avoid memmap overwrite.
> + */
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) &&
> + valid_section(ms))
> + return __section_mem_map_addr(ms);
Again, is check_pfn_span() failing to prevent this path?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists