[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c721b898-4826-9073-e80e-0730dcc18ecf@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:31:14 +0800
From: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] sched/numa: introduce numa locality
On 2020/2/7 上午9:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:10:33 +0800
> 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Peter, Ingo
>>
>> Could you give some comments please?
>
> A little word of advice. When sending new versions of a patch. Don't
> send them as a reply to the previous version. Some developers (and I
> believe Peter is one of them), wont look for new patches in threads,
> and this may never be seen by him.
>
> New versions of patches (v8 in this case) need to start a new thread
> and be at the top level. It's hard to manage patches when a thread
> series in embedded in another thread series.
Aha, I do believe that's the situation...
I'll resend the v8 with the Ack from Randy, thanks for the advice :-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists