lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eev6qtyx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:48:22 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/61] KVM: x86: Check for CPUID 0xD.N support before validating array size

Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> writes:

> Now that sub-leaf 1 is handled separately, verify the next sub-leaf is
> needed before rejecting KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID due to an insufficiently
> sized userspace array.
>
> Note, although this is technically a bug, it's not visible to userspace
> as KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID is guaranteed to fail on KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE,
> which is hardcoded to be added after leaf 0xD.  The real motivation for
> the change is to tightly couple the nent/maxnent and do_host_cpuid()
> sequences in preparation for future cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index fc8540596386..fd9b29aa7abc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -670,13 +670,14 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>  		entry[1].edx = 0;
>  
>  		for (idx = 2, i = 2; idx < 64; ++idx) {
> -			u64 mask = ((u64)1 << idx);
> +			if (!(supported & BIT_ULL(idx)))
> +				continue;
>  
>  			if (*nent >= maxnent)
>  				goto out;
>  
>  			do_host_cpuid(&entry[i], function, idx);
> -			if (entry[i].eax == 0 || !(supported & mask))
> +			if (entry[i].eax == 0)
>  				continue;
>  			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(entry[i].ecx & 1))
>  				continue;

The remaining WARN_ON_ONCE() is technically the same 'bug not visible to
userspace' :-)

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ