linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANMq1KDEdbiHWzfZhvfpKG4cNOnp_x3bMO5rOaCuLzNJ5W4zEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:06:21 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:53 PM Steven Price <steven.price@....com> wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2020 07:16, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > +     err = panfrost_pm_domain_init(pfdev);
> > +     if (err) {
> > +             dev_err(pfdev->dev, "pm_domain init failed %d\n", err);
>
> No need for this print - panfrost_pm_domain_init() will output a (more
> appropriate) error message on failure.

Dropped.

> > +             goto err_out2;
> > +     }
> > +
> [snip]
> > @@ -196,6 +274,7 @@ void panfrost_device_fini(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> >       panfrost_mmu_fini(pfdev);
> >       panfrost_gpu_fini(pfdev);
> >       panfrost_reset_fini(pfdev);
> > +     panfrost_pm_domain_fini(pfdev);
>
> NIT: The reverse of the construction order would be to do this before
> panfrost_reset_fini().

Oh right, fixed.

Thanks.

> [snip]