[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34c67571bf366886aa8298373f3887f476b811a2.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:10:02 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] powerpc/kvm/e500: Use functions to track
lockless pgtbl walks
Hello Christophe,
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 07:18 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> I don't really like unbalanced begin/end.
>
> Something like the following would be cleaner:
>
>
> begin_lockless_pgtbl_walk()
> ptep = find()
> if (ptep) {
> pte = READ_ONCE()
> if (pte_present(pte))
> wing=
> else
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> end_lockless_pgtbl_walk()
>
> if (ret) {
> pr_err_rate...()
> goto out;
> }
>
>
Sure, looks better that way. I will change that for v7.
Thanks for the feedback,
Leonardo Bras
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists