linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 12/12] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200207033735.308000-13-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 19:37:35 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/12] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL_PIN coverage

It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN
behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely
fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite
is going to cause no noticeable change in running time.

So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests:

1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages().

2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like
the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN.

Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual
comparison of the running times, which is convenient.

The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script,
because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the
shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
index a692ea828317..df6a6bf3f238 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
@@ -112,6 +112,28 @@ echo "NOTE: The above hugetlb tests provide minimal coverage.  Use"
 echo "      https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs.git for"
 echo "      hugetlb regression testing."
 
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+echo "running 'gup_benchmark -U' (normal/slow gup)"
+echo "--------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -U
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+echo "running gup_benchmark -b (pin_user_pages)"
+echo "------------------------------------------"
+./gup_benchmark -b
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	echo "[FAIL]"
+	exitcode=1
+else
+	echo "[PASS]"
+fi
+
 echo "-------------------"
 echo "running userfaultfd"
 echo "-------------------"
-- 
2.25.0