lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cda542ae-e0ea-a9bc-53bc-8e91e06d254d@lwfinger.net>
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:29:42 -0600
From:   Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@...gle.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hansverk@...co.com>,
        Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Error building v5.5-git on PowerPC32 - bisected to commit
 7befe621ff81

On 2/6/20 5:33 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:12:13PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> When building post V5.5 on my PowerBook G4 Aluminum, the build failed with the
>>> following error:
>>
>> It's not that the attributes are wrong. The problem is that BUILD_BUG_ON
>> requires a compile-time evaluatable condition. gcc-4.6 is apparently not
>> good enough at optimizing to reduce that expression to a constant,
>> though it was able to do it with the array accesses.
> 
> Should have noted, it fails on x86 too with gcc-4.6.4, not specific to PPC.

What pre-processor test would be correct to skip the test for gcc4?

Larry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ