| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:21:11 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Pavel Shilovsky" <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
"Dave Wysochanski" <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
"Ronnie Sahlberg" <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 132/148] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock
when reconnect occurs
3.16.82-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>
commit d46b0da7a33dd8c99d969834f682267a45444ab3 upstream.
There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
and a disruption occurs causing reconnect. The deadlock is due
a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time. If in
between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
another process, deadlock occurs.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
cifs_strict_readv()
down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
_cifsFileInfo_put
OR
cifs_new_fileinfo
down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
cifs_reopen_file()
down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Reviewed--by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 5 +++++
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 1 +
fs/cifs/file.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
fs/cifs/smb2file.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1113,6 +1113,11 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInf
struct cifsInodeInfo {
bool can_cache_brlcks;
struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
+ /*
+ * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
+ * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
+ * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
+ */
struct rw_semaphore lock_sem; /* protect the fields above */
/* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
struct list_head openFileList;
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ extern int cifs_unlock_range(struct cifs
struct file_lock *flock, const unsigned int xid);
extern int cifs_push_mandatory_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
+extern void cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
extern struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
struct file *file,
struct tcon_link *tlink,
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ cifs_has_mand_locks(struct cifsInodeInfo
return has_locks;
}
+void
+cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
+ msleep(10);
+}
+
struct cifsFileInfo *
cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock)
@@ -306,7 +313,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
cfile->llist = fdlocks;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
@@ -462,7 +469,7 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileIn
* Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
* is closed anyway.
*/
- down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
list_del(&li->llist);
cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
@@ -970,7 +977,7 @@ static void
cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
{
struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(cfile->dentry->d_inode);
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
}
@@ -992,7 +999,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cf
try_again:
exist = false;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
lock->type, &conf_lock, CIFS_LOCK_OP);
@@ -1014,7 +1021,7 @@ try_again:
(lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
if (!rc)
goto try_again;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_del_init(&lock->blist);
}
@@ -1067,7 +1074,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, s
return rc;
try_again:
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
return rc;
@@ -1267,7 +1274,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfi
int rc = 0;
/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
return rc;
@@ -1451,7 +1458,7 @@ cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *c
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
cur = buf;
num = 0;
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ smb2_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *c
cur = buf;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
(flock->fl_start + length) <
Powered by blists - more mailing lists