[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1581185940.855920811@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:20:12 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 073/148] perf probe: Skip end-of-sequence and non
statement lines
3.16.82-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
commit f4d99bdfd124823a81878b44b5e8750b97f73902 upstream.
Skip end-of-sequence and non-statement lines while walking through lines
list.
The "end-of-sequence" line information means:
"the current address is that of the first byte after the
end of a sequence of target machine instructions."
(DWARF version 4 spec 6.2.2)
This actually means out of scope and we can not probe on it.
On the other hand, the statement lines (is_stmt) means:
"the current instruction is a recommended breakpoint location.
A recommended breakpoint location is intended to “represent”
a line, a statement and/or a semantically distinct subpart
of a statement."
(DWARF version 4 spec 6.2.2)
So, non-statement line info also should be skipped.
These can reduce unneeded probe points and also avoid an error.
E.g. without this patch:
# perf probe -a "clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1"
Added new events:
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_1 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_2 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_3 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_4 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_4 -aR sleep 1
#
This puts 5 probes on one line, but acutally it's not inlined function.
This is because there are many non statement instructions at the
function prologue.
With this patch:
# perf probe -a "clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1"
Added new event:
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask -aR sleep 1
#
Now perf-probe skips unneeded addresses.
Committer testing:
Slightly different results, but similar:
Before:
# uname -a
Linux quaco 5.3.8-200.fc30.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Oct 29 14:46:22 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#
# perf probe -a "clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1"
Added new events:
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_1 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_2 (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask_2 -aR sleep 1
#
After:
# perf probe -a "clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1"
Added new event:
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask:1)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask -aR sleep 1
# perf probe -l
probe:clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (on clear_tasks_mm_cpumask@...nel/cpu.c)
#
Fixes: 4cc9cec636e7 ("perf probe: Introduce lines walker interface")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/157241936090.32002.12156347518596111660.stgit@devnote2
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
@@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ int die_walk_lines(Dwarf_Die *rt_die, li
int decl = 0, inl;
Dwarf_Die die_mem, *cu_die;
size_t nlines, i;
+ bool flag;
/* Get the CU die */
if (dwarf_tag(rt_die) != DW_TAG_compile_unit) {
@@ -742,6 +743,12 @@ int die_walk_lines(Dwarf_Die *rt_die, li
"Possible error in debuginfo.\n");
continue;
}
+ /* Skip end-of-sequence */
+ if (dwarf_lineendsequence(line, &flag) != 0 || flag)
+ continue;
+ /* Skip Non statement line-info */
+ if (dwarf_linebeginstatement(line, &flag) != 0 || !flag)
+ continue;
/* Filter lines based on address */
if (rt_die != cu_die) {
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists