lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:07:52 -0800
From:   Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Cc:     thuth@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com, wei.huang2@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum


On 2/7/20 6:27 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> x86_register enum is not used. Its presence incites us
> to enumerate GPRs in the same order in other looming
> structs. So let's remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  | 20 -------------------
>   1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> index 6f7fffaea2e8..e48dac5c29e8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> @@ -36,26 +36,6 @@
>   #define X86_CR4_SMAP		(1ul << 21)
>   #define X86_CR4_PKE		(1ul << 22)
>   
> -/* The enum values match the intruction encoding of each register */
> -enum x86_register {
> -	RAX = 0,
> -	RCX,
> -	RDX,
> -	RBX,
> -	RSP,
> -	RBP,
> -	RSI,
> -	RDI,
> -	R8,
> -	R9,
> -	R10,
> -	R11,
> -	R12,
> -	R13,
> -	R14,
> -	R15,
> -};
> -
>   struct desc64 {
>   	uint16_t limit0;
>   	uint16_t base0;
Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ