[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200209001838.GF955802@ripper>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 16:18:38 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, dri-devel@...edesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add A618 gpu dt blob
On Wed 05 Feb 11:24 PST 2020, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:02 PM Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > + power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>, <&gpucc GX_GDSC>;
>
> I should note that this is going to be a PITA to land because the
> patch adding "GX_GDSC" should technically land in the "clk" tree.
> Without extra work that's going to mean waiting for a full Linux
> release before Bjorn and Andy can land. It might be worth sticking
> the hardcoded "1" in for now instead of "GX_GDSC". That's what we
> often do in cases like this.
>
I'm fine with the patches using the GX_GDSC define and I will replace it
if necessary when applying the patch - but either way we this is
dependent on the clock tree picking up the patch that defines the value.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists