linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200209230713.GB7326@richard>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:07:14 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function
 clear_subsection_map()

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>Wrap the codes clearing subsection map of one memory region in
>section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map().
>

Patch 1 and 2 server the same purpose -- to #ifdef the VMEMMAP.

I suggest to merge these two.

>Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
>---
> mm/sparse.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>index 9ad741ccbeb6..696f6b9f706e 100644
>--- a/mm/sparse.c
>+++ b/mm/sparse.c
>@@ -726,14 +726,25 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
> 
>-static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>-		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>+/**
>+ * clear_subsection_map - Clear subsection map of one memory region
>+ *
>+ * @pfn - start pfn of the memory range
>+ * @nr_pages - number of pfns to add in the region
>+ *
>+ * This is only intended for hotplug, and clear the related subsection
>+ * map inside one section.
>+ *
>+ * Return:
>+ * * -EINVAL	- Section already deactived.
>+ * * 0		- Subsection map is emptied.
>+ * * 1		- Subsection map is not empty.
>+ */
>+static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> 	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> 	DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> 	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>-	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
>-	struct page *memmap = NULL;
> 	unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage
> 		? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL;
> 
>@@ -744,8 +755,28 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> 	if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION),
> 				"section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
> 				pfn, nr_pages))
>-		return;
>+		return -EINVAL;
>+
>+	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> 
>+	if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION))
>+		return 0;
>+
>+	return 1;
>+}
>+
>+static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>+		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>+{
>+	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>+	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
>+	struct page *memmap = NULL;
>+	int rc;
>+
>+
>+	rc = clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages);
>+	if(IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)rc))
>+		return;
> 	/*
> 	 * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations
> 	 * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}):
>@@ -763,8 +794,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> 	 *
> 	 * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified
> 	 */
>-	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
>-	if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)) {
>+	if (!rc) {
> 		unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> 
> 		/*
>-- 
>2.17.2

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me