linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 126/309] ARM: dma-api: fix max_pfn off-by-one error in __dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200210122418.528957067@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:31:22 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 126/309] ARM: dma-api: fix max_pfn off-by-one error in __dma_supported()

From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>

commit f3cc4e1d44a813a0685f2e558b78ace3db559722 upstream.

max_pfn, as set in arch/arm/mm/init.c:

    static void __init find_limits(unsigned long *min,
				   unsigned long *max_low,
				   unsigned long *max_high)
    {
	    *max_low = PFN_DOWN(memblock_get_current_limit());
	    *min = PFN_UP(memblock_start_of_DRAM());
	    *max_high = PFN_DOWN(memblock_end_of_DRAM());
    }

with memblock_end_of_DRAM() pointing to the next byte after DRAM.  As
such, max_pfn points to the PFN after the end of DRAM.

Thus when using max_pfn to check DMA masks, we should subtract one when
checking DMA ranges against it.

Commit 8bf1268f48ad ("ARM: dma-api: fix off-by-one error in
__dma_supported()") fixed the same issue, but missed this spot.

This issue was found while working on the sun4i-csi v4l2 driver on the
Allwinner R40 SoC.  On Allwinner SoCs, DRAM is offset at 0x40000000, and
we are starting to use of_dma_configure() with the "dma-ranges" property
in the device tree to have the DMA API handle the offset.

In this particular instance, dma-ranges was set to the same range as the
actual available (2 GiB) DRAM.  The following error appeared when the
driver attempted to allocate a buffer:

    sun4i-csi 1c09000.csi: Coherent DMA mask 0x7fffffff (pfn 0x40000-0xc0000)
    covers a smaller range of system memory than the DMA zone pfn 0x0-0xc0001
    sun4i-csi 1c09000.csi: dma_alloc_coherent of size 307200 failed

Fixing the off-by-one error makes things work.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191224030239.5656-1-wens@kernel.org
Fixes: 11a5aa32562e ("ARM: dma-mapping: check DMA mask against available memory")
Fixes: 9f28cde0bc64 ("ARM: another fix for the DMA mapping checks")
Fixes: ab746573c405 ("ARM: dma-mapping: allow larger DMA mask than supported")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_coherent_dma_ops);
 
 static int __dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask, bool warn)
 {
-	unsigned long max_dma_pfn = min(max_pfn, arm_dma_pfn_limit);
+	unsigned long max_dma_pfn = min(max_pfn - 1, arm_dma_pfn_limit);
 
 	/*
 	 * Translate the device's DMA mask to a PFN limit.  This