linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 116/309] ovl: fix wrong WARN_ON() in ovl_cache_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200210122417.690355831@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:31:12 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 116/309] ovl: fix wrong WARN_ON() in ovl_cache_update_ino()

From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>

commit 4c37e71b713ecffe81f8e6273c6835e54306d412 upstream.

The WARN_ON() that child entry is always on overlay st_dev became wrong
when we allowed this function to update d_ino in non-samefs setup with xino
enabled.

It is not true in case of xino bits overflow on a non-dir inode.  Leave the
WARN_ON() only for directories, where assertion is still true.

Fixes: adbf4f7ea834 ("ovl: consistent d_ino for non-samefs with xino")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/overlayfs/readdir.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
@@ -504,7 +504,13 @@ get:
 		if (err)
 			goto fail;
 
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(dir->d_sb->s_dev != stat.dev);
+		/*
+		 * Directory inode is always on overlay st_dev.
+		 * Non-dir with ovl_same_dev() could be on pseudo st_dev in case
+		 * of xino bits overflow.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(S_ISDIR(stat.mode) &&
+			     dir->d_sb->s_dev != stat.dev);
 		ino = stat.ino;
 	} else if (xinobits && !OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type)) {
 		ino = ovl_remap_lower_ino(ino, xinobits,