lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200210122407.130550741@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:29:27 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 011/309] rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit f71dbf2fb28489a79bde0dca1c8adfb9cdb20a6b ]

In rxrpc_input_data(), rxrpc_notify_socket() is called if the base sequence
number of the packet is immediately following the hard-ack point at the end
of the function.  However, this isn't sufficient, since the recvmsg side
may have been advancing the window and then overrun the position in which
we're adding - at which point rx_hard_ack >= seq0 and no notification is
generated.

Fix this by always generating a notification at the end of the input
function.

Without this, a long call may stall, possibly indefinitely.

Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/input.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -599,10 +599,8 @@ ack:
 				  false, true,
 				  rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data);
 
-	if (seq0 == READ_ONCE(call->rx_hard_ack) + 1) {
-		trace_rxrpc_notify_socket(call->debug_id, serial);
-		rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
-	}
+	trace_rxrpc_notify_socket(call->debug_id, serial);
+	rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
 
 unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&call->input_lock);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ