lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200210122323.763498534@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:34:08 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 190/195] mm/page_alloc.c: fix uninitialized memmaps on a partially populated last section

From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit e822969cab48b786b64246aad1a3ba2a774f5d23 ]

Patch series "mm: fix max_pfn not falling on section boundary", v2.

Playing with different memory sizes for a x86-64 guest, I discovered that
some memmaps (highest section if max_mem does not fall on the section
boundary) are marked as being valid and online, but contain garbage.  We
have to properly initialize these memmaps.

Looking at /proc/kpageflags and friends, I found some more issues,
partially related to this.

This patch (of 3):

If max_pfn is not aligned to a section boundary, we can easily run into
BUGs.  This can e.g., be triggered on x86-64 under QEMU by specifying a
memory size that is not a multiple of 128MB (e.g., 4097MB, but also
4160MB).  I was told that on real HW, we can easily have this scenario
(esp., one of the main reasons sub-section hotadd of devmem was added).

The issue is, that we have a valid memmap (pfn_valid()) for the whole
section, and the whole section will be marked "online".
pfn_to_online_page() will succeed, but the memmap contains garbage.

E.g., doing a "./page-types -r -a 0x144001" when QEMU was started with "-m
4160M" - (see tools/vm/page-types.c):

[  200.476376] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[  200.477500] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  200.478334] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  200.479076] PGD 59614067 P4D 59614067 PUD 59616067 PMD 0
[  200.479557] Oops: 0000 [#4] SMP NOPTI
[  200.479875] CPU: 0 PID: 603 Comm: page-types Tainted: G      D W         5.5.0-rc1-next-20191209 #93
[  200.480646] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[  200.481648] RIP: 0010:stable_page_flags+0x4d/0x410
[  200.482061] Code: f3 ff 41 89 c0 48 b8 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 45 84 c0 0f 85 cd 02 00 00 48 8b 53 08 48 8b 2b 48f
[  200.483644] RSP: 0018:ffffb139401cbe60 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  200.484091] RAX: fffffffffffffffe RBX: fffffbeec5100040 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  200.484697] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9535c7cd RDI: 0000000000000246
[  200.485313] RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  200.485917] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000144001
[  200.486523] R13: 00007ffd6ba55f48 R14: 00007ffd6ba55f40 R15: ffffb139401cbf08
[  200.487130] FS:  00007f68df717580(0000) GS:ffff9ec77fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  200.487804] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  200.488295] CR2: fffffffffffffffe CR3: 0000000135d48000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[  200.488897] Call Trace:
[  200.489115]  kpageflags_read+0xe9/0x140
[  200.489447]  proc_reg_read+0x3c/0x60
[  200.489755]  vfs_read+0xc2/0x170
[  200.490037]  ksys_pread64+0x65/0xa0
[  200.490352]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[  200.490665]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

But it can be triggered much easier via "cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null"
after cold/hot plugging a DIMM to such a system:

[root@...alhost ~]# cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null
[  111.517275] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[  111.517907] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  111.518333] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  111.518771] PGD a240e067 P4D a240e067 PUD a2410067 PMD 0

This patch fixes that by at least zero-ing out that memmap (so e.g.,
page_to_pfn() will not crash).  Commit 907ec5fca3dc ("mm: zero remaining
unavailable struct pages") tried to fix a similar issue, but forgot to
consider this special case.

After this patch, there are still problems to solve.  E.g., not all of
these pages falling into a memory hole will actually get initialized later
and set PageReserved - they are only zeroed out - but at least the
immediate crashes are gone.  A follow-up patch will take care of this.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211163201.17179-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: f7f99100d8d9 ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>	[4.15+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 8a00c32191263..e5c610d711f32 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6489,7 +6489,8 @@ static u64 zero_pfn_range(unsigned long spfn, unsigned long epfn)
  * This function also addresses a similar issue where struct pages are left
  * uninitialized because the physical address range is not covered by
  * memblock.memory or memblock.reserved. That could happen when memblock
- * layout is manually configured via memmap=.
+ * layout is manually configured via memmap=, or when the highest physical
+ * address (max_pfn) does not end on a section boundary.
  */
 void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
 {
@@ -6507,7 +6508,16 @@ void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
 			pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), PFN_UP(start));
 		next = end;
 	}
-	pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), max_pfn);
+
+	/*
+	 * Early sections always have a fully populated memmap for the whole
+	 * section - see pfn_valid(). If the last section has holes at the
+	 * end and that section is marked "online", the memmap will be
+	 * considered initialized. Make sure that memmap has a well defined
+	 * state.
+	 */
+	pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next),
+				round_up(max_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION));
 
 	/*
 	 * Struct pages that do not have backing memory. This could be because
-- 
2.20.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ