[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200210122323.673345339@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:34:07 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 189/195] mm: return zero_resv_unavail optimization
From: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>
[ Upstream commit ec393a0f014eaf688a3dbe8c8a4cbb52d7f535f9 ]
When checking for valid pfns in zero_resv_unavail(), it is not necessary
to verify that pfns within pageblock_nr_pages ranges are valid, only the
first one needs to be checked. This is because memory for pages are
allocated in contiguous chunks that contain pageblock_nr_pages struct
pages.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002143821.5112-3-msys.mizuma@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 19f2e77d1c50b..8a00c32191263 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6456,6 +6456,29 @@ void __init free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long *zones_size,
}
#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP)
+
+/*
+ * Zero all valid struct pages in range [spfn, epfn), return number of struct
+ * pages zeroed
+ */
+static u64 zero_pfn_range(unsigned long spfn, unsigned long epfn)
+{
+ unsigned long pfn;
+ u64 pgcnt = 0;
+
+ for (pfn = spfn; pfn < epfn; pfn++) {
+ if (!pfn_valid(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages))) {
+ pfn = ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)
+ + pageblock_nr_pages - 1;
+ continue;
+ }
+ mm_zero_struct_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+ pgcnt++;
+ }
+
+ return pgcnt;
+}
+
/*
* Only struct pages that are backed by physical memory are zeroed and
* initialized by going through __init_single_page(). But, there are some
@@ -6471,7 +6494,6 @@ void __init free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long *zones_size,
void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
{
phys_addr_t start, end;
- unsigned long pfn;
u64 i, pgcnt;
phys_addr_t next = 0;
@@ -6481,34 +6503,18 @@ void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
pgcnt = 0;
for_each_mem_range(i, &memblock.memory, NULL,
NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &start, &end, NULL) {
- if (next < start) {
- for (pfn = PFN_DOWN(next); pfn < PFN_UP(start); pfn++) {
- if (!pfn_valid(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)))
- continue;
- mm_zero_struct_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
- pgcnt++;
- }
- }
+ if (next < start)
+ pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), PFN_UP(start));
next = end;
}
- for (pfn = PFN_DOWN(next); pfn < max_pfn; pfn++) {
- if (!pfn_valid(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)))
- continue;
- mm_zero_struct_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
- pgcnt++;
- }
-
+ pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), max_pfn);
/*
* Struct pages that do not have backing memory. This could be because
* firmware is using some of this memory, or for some other reasons.
- * Once memblock is changed so such behaviour is not allowed: i.e.
- * list of "reserved" memory must be a subset of list of "memory", then
- * this code can be removed.
*/
if (pgcnt)
pr_info("Zeroed struct page in unavailable ranges: %lld pages", pgcnt);
-
}
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK && !CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP */
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists