[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200210143717.GO7685@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:37:17 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
perex@...ex.cz, lars@...afoo.de, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dmaengine_pcm: Consider DMA cache caused delay in
pointer callback
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 10/02/2020 16.21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> delay += codec_delay;
> >>
> >> - runtime->delay = delay;
> >> + runtime->delay += delay;
> > Is it correct?
> > delay already takes runtime->delay as its basis, so it'll result in a
> > double.
> The delay here is coming from the DAI and the codec.
> The runtime->delay hold the PCM (DMA) caused delay.
I think Takashi's point here (and a query I have) is that we end up with
delay = runtime->delay;
delay += stuff;
runtime->delay += delay;
which is equivalent to
runtime->delay = (runtime->delay * 2) + stuff;
and that's a bit surprising.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists