[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b148f0b6-d2ae-6520-8da1-7aed2c9e1d6b@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:55:00 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <will@...nel.org>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<james.clark@....com>, <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
<robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/7] perf jevents: Add support for a system events PMU
On 10/02/2020 12:07, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:35:01PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> - Set of 'PMU events tables' for all known CPUs in the architecture,
>> @@ -83,11 +93,11 @@ NOTES:
>> 2. The 'pmu-events.h' has an extern declaration for the mapping table
>> and the generated 'pmu-events.c' defines this table.
>>
>> - 3. _All_ known CPU tables for architecture are included in the perf
>> - binary.
>> + 3. _All_ known CPU and system tables for architecture are included in
>> + the perf binary.
>>
>> -At run time, perf determines the actual CPU it is running on, finds the
>> -matching events table and builds aliases for those events. This allows
>> +At run time, perf determines the actual CPU or system it is running on, finds
>> +the matching events table and builds aliases for those events. This allows
>> users to specify events by their name:
>>
>> $ perf stat -e pm_1plus_ppc_cmpl sleep 1
>> @@ -150,3 +160,18 @@ where:
>>
>> i.e the three CPU models use the JSON files (i.e PMU events) listed
>> in the directory 'tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/silvermont'.
>> +
>> +The mapfile_sys.csv format is slightly different, in that it contains a SYSID
>> +instead of the CPUID:
>> +
>> + Header line
>> + SYSID,Version,Dir/path/name,Type
>
Hi jirka,
> can't we just add prefix to SYSID types? like:
>
> SYSID-HIP08,v1,hisilicon/hip08/sys,sys
> 0x00000000480fd010,v1,hisilicon/hip08/cpu,core
> 0x00000000500f0000,v1,ampere/emag,core
>
> because the rest of the line is the same, right?
I did consider that already. It should be workable.
>
> seems to me that having one mapfile type would be less confusing
I thought that having it all in a single file would be more confusing :)
>
As for this separate comment:
>> + if (!strcmp(bname, "mapfile_sys.csv")) {
>> + mapfile_sys = strdup(fpath);
>
>
> we could release that in the cleanup code at the end of main
> together with 'mapfile',
That should now go away.
> which is also missing
Right, I'll look to fix that.
Thanks,
John
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists