[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41d61aa5-db98-6291-d91f-104f029c897f@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:40:39 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMA: Add log statements for failure conditions.
On 2/9/20 6:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>> In addition, as Shuah Khan suggested for the security/integrity/
>> directory, "there is an opportunity here to add #define pr_fmt(fmt)
>> KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt to integrity.h and get rid of duplicate
>> defines."
Good point - we'll make that change.
With Joe Perches patch (waiting for it to be re-posted),
>> are all the pr_fmt definitions needed in each file in the
>> integrity/ima directory?
>
> btw Tushar and Lakshmi:
>
> I am not formally submitting a patch here.
>
> I was just making suggestions and please do
> with it as you think appropriate.
Joe - it's not clear to me what you are suggesting.
We'll move the #define for pr_fmt to integrity.h.
What's other changes are you proposing?
>>>
>>> out:
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + pr_err("Process buffer measurement failed, result: %d\n",
>>> + ret);
>>
>> There's no reason to split the statement like this. The joined line
>> is less than 80 characters.
Agree.
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists