[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200210180546.vt7yhdjav5oinij7@box>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:05:46 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elver@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix a data race in filemap_fault()
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:25:11AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:00:29PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > @@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> > if (page->index >= max_idx)
> > goto unlock;
> >
> > - if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0)
> > + if (data_race(file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0))
> > file->f_ra.mmap_miss--;
>
> How is this safe? Two threads can each see 1, and then both decrement the
> in-memory copy, causing it to end up at -1.
Right, it is bogus.
Below is my completely untested attempt on fix this. It still allows
races, but they will only lead to missed accounting, but not underflow.
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 1784478270e1..1919d37c646a 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2365,6 +2365,7 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
struct file *fpin = NULL;
pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
+ unsigned mmap_miss;
/* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
@@ -2380,14 +2381,15 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
}
/* Avoid banging the cache line if not needed */
- if (ra->mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10)
- ra->mmap_miss++;
+ mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss);
+ if (mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10)
+ WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, ++mmap_miss);
/*
* Do we miss much more than hit in this file? If so,
* stop bothering with read-ahead. It will only hurt.
*/
- if (ra->mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS)
+ if (mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS)
return fpin;
/*
@@ -2413,13 +2415,15 @@ static struct file *do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf,
struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
struct file *fpin = NULL;
+ unsigned int mmap_miss;
pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
/* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
return fpin;
- if (ra->mmap_miss > 0)
- ra->mmap_miss--;
+ mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss);
+ if (mmap_miss)
+ WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, --mmap_miss);
if (PageReadahead(page)) {
fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin);
page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file,
@@ -2586,7 +2590,9 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
unsigned long max_idx;
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, start_pgoff);
struct page *page;
+ unsigned long mmap_miss;
+ mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, page, end_pgoff) {
if (xas_retry(&xas, page))
@@ -2622,8 +2628,8 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
if (page->index >= max_idx)
goto unlock;
- if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0)
- file->f_ra.mmap_miss--;
+ if (mmap_miss > 0)
+ mmap_miss--;
vmf->address += (xas.xa_index - last_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT;
if (vmf->pte)
@@ -2643,6 +2649,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ WRITE_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss, mmap_miss);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_map_pages);
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists