linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix a data race in filemap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1581364697.7365.45.camel@lca.pw>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:58:17 -0500
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elver@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix a data race in filemap_fault()

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 21:05 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:25:11AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:00:29PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > @@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> > >  		if (page->index >= max_idx)
> > >  			goto unlock;
> > >  
> > > -		if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0)
> > > +		if (data_race(file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0))
> > >  			file->f_ra.mmap_miss--;
> > 
> > How is this safe?  Two threads can each see 1, and then both decrement the
> > in-memory copy, causing it to end up at -1.
> 
> Right, it is bogus.
> 
> Below is my completely untested attempt on fix this. It still allows
> races, but they will only lead to missed accounting, but not underflow.

Looks good to me. Do you plan to send out an official patch?

> 
> 
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 1784478270e1..1919d37c646a 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -2365,6 +2365,7 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
>  	struct file *fpin = NULL;
>  	pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
> +	unsigned mmap_miss;
>  
>  	/* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
>  	if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
> @@ -2380,14 +2381,15 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Avoid banging the cache line if not needed */
> -	if (ra->mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10)
> -		ra->mmap_miss++;
> +	mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss);
> +	if (mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10)
> +		WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, ++mmap_miss);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Do we miss much more than hit in this file? If so,
>  	 * stop bothering with read-ahead. It will only hurt.
>  	 */
> -	if (ra->mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS)
> +	if (mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS)
>  		return fpin;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2413,13 +2415,15 @@ static struct file *do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  	struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
>  	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
>  	struct file *fpin = NULL;
> +	unsigned int mmap_miss;
>  	pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
>  
>  	/* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
>  	if (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)
>  		return fpin;
> -	if (ra->mmap_miss > 0)
> -		ra->mmap_miss--;
> +	mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss);
> +	if (mmap_miss)
> +		WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, --mmap_miss);
>  	if (PageReadahead(page)) {
>  		fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin);
>  		page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file,
> @@ -2586,7 +2590,9 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  	unsigned long max_idx;
>  	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, start_pgoff);
>  	struct page *page;
> +	unsigned long mmap_miss;
>  
> +	mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss);
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	xas_for_each(&xas, page, end_pgoff) {
>  		if (xas_retry(&xas, page))
> @@ -2622,8 +2628,8 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  		if (page->index >= max_idx)
>  			goto unlock;
>  
> -		if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0)
> -			file->f_ra.mmap_miss--;
> +		if (mmap_miss > 0)
> +			mmap_miss--;
>  
>  		vmf->address += (xas.xa_index - last_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		if (vmf->pte)
> @@ -2643,6 +2649,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  			break;
>  	}
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	WRITE_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss, mmap_miss);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_map_pages);
>