| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:21:53 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] block: Change the dispatch_request() API to
support batch requests
Hi Jens and Paolo,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:25 PM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Now some SD/MMC host controllers can support packed command or packed request,
> that means we can package several requests to host controller at one time
> to improve performence.
>
> But the blk-mq always takes one request from the scheduler and dispatch it to
> the device, regardless of the driver or the scheduler, so there should only
> ever be one request in the local list in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(), that means
> the bd.last is always true and the driver can not use bd.last to decide if
> there are requests are pending now in hardware queue to help to package
> requests.
>
> Thus this is a preparation patch, which tries to change the dispatch_request()
> API to allow dispatching more than one request from the scheduler.
Do you have any comments for patch 1 and patch 2 in this patch set? Thanks.
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 12 +++++++++---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 15 ++++-----------
> block/kyber-iosched.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> block/mq-deadline.c | 12 +++++++++---
> include/linux/elevator.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index ad4af4a..decabc4 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -4774,7 +4774,8 @@ static inline void bfq_update_dispatch_stats(struct request_queue *q,
> bool idle_timer_disabled) {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG */
>
> -static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +static int bfq_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> + struct list_head *list)
> {
> struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
> struct request *rq;
> @@ -4796,7 +4797,12 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> bfq_update_dispatch_stats(hctx->queue, rq, in_serv_queue,
> idle_timer_disabled);
>
> - return rq;
> + if (!rq)
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_add(&rq->queuelist, list);
> +
> + return 1;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6772,7 +6778,7 @@ static ssize_t bfq_low_latency_store(struct elevator_queue *e,
> .finish_request = bfq_finish_requeue_request,
> .exit_icq = bfq_exit_icq,
> .insert_requests = bfq_insert_requests,
> - .dispatch_request = bfq_dispatch_request,
> + .dispatch_requests = bfq_dispatch_requests,
> .next_request = elv_rb_latter_request,
> .former_request = elv_rb_former_request,
> .allow_merge = bfq_allow_bio_merge,
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index ca22afd..f49f9d9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -90,28 +90,21 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
> LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
> + int ret;
>
> do {
> - struct request *rq;
> -
> if (e->type->ops.has_work && !e->type->ops.has_work(hctx))
> break;
>
> if (!blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(hctx))
> break;
>
> - rq = e->type->ops.dispatch_request(hctx);
> - if (!rq) {
> + ret = e->type->ops.dispatch_requests(hctx, &rq_list);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> blk_mq_put_dispatch_budget(hctx);
> break;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Now this rq owns the budget which has to be released
> - * if this rq won't be queued to driver via .queue_rq()
> - * in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list().
> - */
> - list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
> } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
> }
>
> @@ -171,7 +164,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
> - const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.dispatch_request;
> + const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.dispatch_requests;
> LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
>
> /* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
> diff --git a/block/kyber-iosched.c b/block/kyber-iosched.c
> index 34dcea0..8f58434 100644
> --- a/block/kyber-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/kyber-iosched.c
> @@ -796,12 +796,13 @@ static int kyber_get_domain_token(struct kyber_queue_data *kqd,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct request *kyber_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +static int kyber_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> + struct list_head *list)
> {
> struct kyber_queue_data *kqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
> struct kyber_hctx_data *khd = hctx->sched_data;
> struct request *rq;
> - int i;
> + int i, ret = 0;
>
> spin_lock(&khd->lock);
>
> @@ -811,8 +812,11 @@ static struct request *kyber_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> */
> if (khd->batching < kyber_batch_size[khd->cur_domain]) {
> rq = kyber_dispatch_cur_domain(kqd, khd, hctx);
> - if (rq)
> + if (rq) {
> + list_add(&rq->queuelist, list);
> + ret = 1;
> goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -832,14 +836,16 @@ static struct request *kyber_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> khd->cur_domain++;
>
> rq = kyber_dispatch_cur_domain(kqd, khd, hctx);
> - if (rq)
> + if (rq) {
> + list_add(&rq->queuelist, list);
> + ret = 1;
> goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> - rq = NULL;
> out:
> spin_unlock(&khd->lock);
> - return rq;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static bool kyber_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> @@ -1020,7 +1026,7 @@ static int kyber_batching_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
> .finish_request = kyber_finish_request,
> .requeue_request = kyber_finish_request,
> .completed_request = kyber_completed_request,
> - .dispatch_request = kyber_dispatch_request,
> + .dispatch_requests = kyber_dispatch_requests,
> .has_work = kyber_has_work,
> },
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS
> diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
> index b490f47..9fbffba 100644
> --- a/block/mq-deadline.c
> +++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,8 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
> * different hardware queue. This is because mq-deadline has shared
> * state for all hardware queues, in terms of sorting, FIFOs, etc.
> */
> -static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +static int dd_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> + struct list_head *list)
> {
> struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
> struct request *rq;
> @@ -387,7 +388,12 @@ static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> rq = __dd_dispatch_request(dd);
> spin_unlock(&dd->lock);
>
> - return rq;
> + if (!rq)
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_add(&rq->queuelist, list);
> +
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static void dd_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue *e)
> @@ -774,7 +780,7 @@ static void deadline_dispatch_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> static struct elevator_type mq_deadline = {
> .ops = {
> .insert_requests = dd_insert_requests,
> - .dispatch_request = dd_dispatch_request,
> + .dispatch_requests = dd_dispatch_requests,
> .prepare_request = dd_prepare_request,
> .finish_request = dd_finish_request,
> .next_request = elv_rb_latter_request,
> diff --git a/include/linux/elevator.h b/include/linux/elevator.h
> index 901bda3..a65bf5d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/elevator.h
> +++ b/include/linux/elevator.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct elevator_mq_ops {
> void (*prepare_request)(struct request *, struct bio *bio);
> void (*finish_request)(struct request *);
> void (*insert_requests)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *, struct list_head *, bool);
> - struct request *(*dispatch_request)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
> + int (*dispatch_requests)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *, struct list_head *);
> bool (*has_work)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
> void (*completed_request)(struct request *, u64);
> void (*requeue_request)(struct request *);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists