linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Rework READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:59:56 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:50:53PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:33 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:59:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:33 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is version two of the patches I previously posted as an RFC here:
> > >
> > > Looks fine to me, as far as I can tell,
> >
> > Awesome, I've picked them up with a target for tip/locking/core.
> 
> Were they really picked up?
> 
> The MW is closed now, but I do not them in Linus' tree.
> I do not see them even in linux-next.

We ended up running into build issues with m68k which took quite a bit of
effort to fix, so that meant we missed the merge window. It also seems that
we've now run into similar looking issues for sparc32 :(

Will