lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211192701.GA1971434@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:27:01 -0800
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pragat Pandya <pragat.pandya@...il.com>
Cc:     valdis.kletnieks@...edu, devel@...verdev.osuosl.or,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] staging: exfat: Rename function "ffsUmountVol" to
 "ffs_umount_vol"

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:08:42PM +0530, Pragat Pandya wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warning: Avoid CamelCase
> Change all occurrences of function "ffsUmountVol" to "ffs_umount_vol"
> in the source.

I've said this before about this type of change, but there's no need for
the "ffs" prefix at all for almost all of these functions.  Can you just
name them sanely instead?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ