[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211192701.GA1971434@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:27:01 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pragat Pandya <pragat.pandya@...il.com>
Cc: valdis.kletnieks@...edu, devel@...verdev.osuosl.or,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] staging: exfat: Rename function "ffsUmountVol" to
"ffs_umount_vol"
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:08:42PM +0530, Pragat Pandya wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warning: Avoid CamelCase
> Change all occurrences of function "ffsUmountVol" to "ffs_umount_vol"
> in the source.
I've said this before about this type of change, but there's no need for
the "ffs" prefix at all for almost all of these functions. Can you just
name them sanely instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists