[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211193910.GA4596@embeddedor>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:39:10 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: core: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
sound/core/oss/rate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/oss/rate.c b/sound/core/oss/rate.c
index 2fa9299a440d..e9f20fefb117 100644
--- a/sound/core/oss/rate.c
+++ b/sound/core/oss/rate.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct rate_priv {
unsigned int pos;
rate_f func;
snd_pcm_sframes_t old_src_frames, old_dst_frames;
- struct rate_channel channels[0];
+ struct rate_channel channels[];
};
static void rate_init(struct snd_pcm_plugin *plugin)
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists