[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3830254.4za0FlGIKD@kreacher>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:08:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/28] cpuidle: Call cpu_latency_qos_limit() instead of pm_qos_request()
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Call cpu_latency_qos_limit() instead of pm_qos_request(), because the
latter is going to be dropped.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c
index e48271e117a3..29acaf48e575 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c
@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ int cpuidle_register_governor(struct cpuidle_governor *gov)
*/
s64 cpuidle_governor_latency_req(unsigned int cpu)
{
- int global_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
struct device *device = get_cpu_device(cpu);
int device_req = dev_pm_qos_raw_resume_latency(device);
+ int global_req = cpu_latency_qos_limit();
if (device_req > global_req)
device_req = global_req;
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists