[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad96269f-753d-54b8-a4ae-59d1595dd3b2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:02:50 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Zha Bin <zhabin@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, slp@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com,
gerry@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] virtio-mmio: add MSI interrupt
feature support
On 2020/2/11 上午11:35, Liu, Jing2 wrote:
>
> On 2/11/2020 11:17 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/2/10 下午5:05, Zha Bin wrote:
>>> From: Liu Jiang<gerry@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>
>>> Userspace VMMs (e.g. Qemu microvm, Firecracker) take advantage of using
>>> virtio over mmio devices as a lightweight machine model for modern
>>> cloud. The standard virtio over MMIO transport layer only supports one
>>> legacy interrupt, which is much heavier than virtio over PCI transport
>>> layer using MSI. Legacy interrupt has long work path and causes
>>> specific
>>> VMExits in following cases, which would considerably slow down the
>>> performance:
>>>
>>> 1) read interrupt status register
>>> 2) update interrupt status register
>>> 3) write IOAPIC EOI register
>>>
>>> We proposed to add MSI support for virtio over MMIO via new feature
>>> bit VIRTIO_F_MMIO_MSI[1] which increases the interrupt performance.
>>>
>>> With the VIRTIO_F_MMIO_MSI feature bit supported, the virtio-mmio MSI
>>> uses msi_sharing[1] to indicate the event and vector mapping.
>>> Bit 1 is 0: device uses non-sharing and fixed vector per event mapping.
>>> Bit 1 is 1: device uses sharing mode and dynamic mapping.
>>
>>
>> I believe dynamic mapping should cover the case of fixed vector?
>>
> Actually this bit *aims* for msi sharing or msi non-sharing.
>
> It means, when msi sharing bit is 1, device doesn't want vector per queue
>
> (it wants msi vector sharing as name) and doesn't want a high
> interrupt rate.
>
> So driver turns to !per_vq_vectors and has to do dynamical mapping.
>
> So they are opposite not superset.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jing
I think you need add more comments on the command.
E.g if I want to map vector 0 to queue 1, how do I need to do?
write(1, queue_sel);
write(0, vector_sel);
?
Thanks
>
>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@...ts.oasis-open.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@...ts.oasis-open.org
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists