lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:18:08 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 000/367] 5.5.3-stable review

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:25:14AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 23:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:28:33AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.3 release.
> > > There are 367 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:18:57 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.3-rc1.gz
> >
> > -rc2 is out to fix an arm64 build issue:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.3-rc2.gz
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

THanks for testing this and the others and letting me know.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ