[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5930767-496b-2bd7-2cf6-5e68e39f65e8@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:14:41 +0200
From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in" <m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>,
"l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in" <l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"andrew.murray@....com" <andrew.murray@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4
driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs
On 11.02.2020 16:48, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:04 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-02-11 12:13 pm, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> This is a known issue about DPAA2 MC bus not working well with SMMU
>>>> based IO mapping. Adding Laurentiu to the chain who has been looking
>>>> into this issue.
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm closely following the issue. I actually have a workaround
>>> (attached) but haven't submitted as it will probably raise a lot of
>>> eyebrows. In the mean time I'm following some discussions [1][2][3] on
>>> the iommu list which seem to try to tackle what appears to be a similar
>>> issue but with framebuffers. My hope is that we will be able to leverage
>>> whatever turns out.
>>
>> Indeed it's more general than framebuffers - in fact there was a
>> specific requirement from the IORT side to accommodate network/storage
>> controllers with in-memory firmware/configuration data/whatever set up
>> by the bootloader that want to be handed off 'live' to Linux because the
>> overhead of stopping and restarting them is impractical. Thus this DPAA2
>> setup is very much within scope of the desired solution, so please feel
>> free to join in (particularly on the DT parts) :)
>
> That's a real problem that nees a solution, but that's not what's
> happening here, since cold boots works fine.
>
> Isn't it a whole lot more likely that something isn't
> reset/reinitialized properly in u-boot, such that there is lingering
> state in the setup, causing this?
Ok, so this is completely something else. I don't think our u-boots are
designed to run in ways other than coming from hard reset.
>> As for right now, note that your patch would only be a partial
>> mitigation to slightly reduce the fault window but not remove it
>> entirely. To be robust the SMMU driver *has* to know about live streams
>> before the first arm_smmu_reset() - hence the need for generic firmware
>> bindings - so doing anything from the MC driver is already too late (and
>> indeed the current iommu_request_dm_for_dev() mechanism is itself a
>> microcosm of the same problem).
>
> This is more likely a live stream that's left behind from the previous
> kernel (there are some error messages about being unable to detach
> domains, but the errors make it hard to tell what driver didn't unbind
> enough).
I also noticed those messages. Perhaps our PCI driver doesn't do all the
required cleanup.
> *BUT*, even with that bug, the system should reboot reliably and come
> up clean. So, something isn't clearing up the state *on boot*.
We do test some kexec based "soft-reset" scenarios, didn't hit your
issue but instead we hit this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/21/1066
Can you please provide some more info on your scenario?
---
Best Regards, Laurentiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists