[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211152945.GW14946@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:29:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/perf: Move rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() to perf
trace point hook
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:05:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So we haz:
>
> | #define nmi_enter() \
> | do { \
> | arch_nmi_enter(); \
>
> arm64 only, lets ignore for now
>
> | printk_nmi_enter(); \
>
> notrace
>
> | lockdep_off(); \
>
> notrace
>
> | ftrace_nmi_enter(); \
>
> !notrace !!!
>
> | BUG_ON(in_nmi()); \
> | preempt_count_add(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET);\
>
> lets make this __preempt_count_add() ASAP !
preempt_count_add() first frobs the actual preempt_count and then does
the trace, so that might just work. But it does need a notrace
annotation, I'm thinking, because calling into the function tracer
_before_ we do the preempt_count increment is irrecoverable crap.
> | rcu_nmi_enter(); \
>
> are you _really_ sure you want to go trace that ?!?
>
> | trace_hardirq_enter(); \
> | } while (0)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists