[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211172033.6094878c@kemnade.info>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:24:50 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
lee.jones@...aro.org, b.galvani@...il.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, phh@....me, stefan@...er.ch,
letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: adc: rn5t618: Add ADC driver for
RN5T618/RC5T619
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 17:33:55 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:20:54 +0100
> Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info> wrote:
>
> > Both chips have an A/D converter capable of measuring
> > things like VBAT, VUSB and analog inputs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> Sorry I missed one bigger thing in here around PROCESSED vs RAW.
> See inline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - enum for channels
> > - bulk read instead of single byte read for conversion
> > result
> > - fix get_virq error handling
> > - use devm for registering device and requesting IRQ
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 10 ++
> > drivers/iio/adc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 264 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > index f0af3a42f53c..9ea9489e3f0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig
> > @@ -735,6 +735,16 @@ config RCAR_GYRO_ADC
> > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > module will be called rcar-gyroadc.
> >
> > +config RN5T618_ADC
> > + tristate "ADC for the RN5T618/RC5T619 family of chips"
> > + depends on MFD_RN5T618
> > + help
> > + Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside the
> > + RN5T618/619 series PMICs:
> Why :?
> > +
> > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> > + will be called rn5t618-adc.
> > +
> > config ROCKCHIP_SARADC
> > tristate "Rockchip SARADC driver"
> > depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/Makefile b/drivers/iio/adc/Makefile
> > index ef9cc485fb67..2aea70556ed0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/Makefile
> > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_VADC_COMMON) += qcom-vadc-common.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SPMI_VADC) += qcom-spmi-vadc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_PM8XXX_XOADC) += qcom-pm8xxx-xoadc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RCAR_GYRO_ADC) += rcar-gyroadc.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_RN5T618_ADC) += rn5t618-adc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SARADC) += rockchip_saradc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SC27XX_ADC) += sc27xx_adc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SPEAR_ADC) += spear_adc.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..667bd814569d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * ADC driver for the RICOH RN5T618 power management chip family
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Andreas Kemnade
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/rn5t618.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/completion.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> I may be missing something, but I'm not immediately seeing any irq_domain*
> calls? I suspect the only call is via stuff buried in regmap so we probably
> don't need the header here.
>
> > +
> > +#define RN5T618_ADC_CONVERSION_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(500))
> > +#define REFERENCE_VOLT 2500
>
> Please prefix these defines
> RN5T618_*
>
Does that also apply for the defines below?
> It avoids potential clashes in future with things defined in headers.
>
> > +
> > +/* mask for selecting channels for single conversion */
> > +#define ADCCNT3_CHANNEL_MASK 0x7
> > +/* average 4-time conversion mode */
> > +#define ADCCNT3_AVG BIT(3)
> > +/* set for starting a single conversion, gets cleared by hw when done */
> > +#define ADCCNT3_GODONE BIT(4)
> > +/* automatic conversion, period is in ADCCNT2, selected channels are
> > + * in ADCCNT1
> > + */
> > +#define ADCCNT3_AUTO BIT(5)
> > +#define ADCEND_IRQ BIT(0)
> > +
> > +struct rn5t618_adc_data {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct rn5t618 *rn5t618;
> > + struct completion conv_completion;
> > + int irq;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct rn5t618_channel_ratios {
> > + u16 numerator;
> > + u16 denominator;
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum rn5t618_channels {
> > + LIMMON = 0,
> > + VBAT,
> > + VADP,
> > + VUSB,
> > + VSYS,
> > + VTHM,
> > + AIN1,
> > + AIN0
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct rn5t618_channel_ratios rn5t618_ratios[8] = {
> > + [LIMMON] = {50, 32}, /* measured across 20mOhm, amplified by 32 */
> > + [VBAT] = {2, 1},
> > + [VADP] = {3, 1},
> > + [VUSB] = {3, 1},
> > + [VSYS] = {3, 1},
> > + [VTHM] = {1, 1},
> > + [AIN1] = {1, 1},
> > + [AIN0] = {1, 1},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rn5t618_read_adc_reg(struct rn5t618 *rn5t618, int reg, u16 *val)
> > +{
> > + u8 data[2];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_bulk_read(rn5t618->regmap, reg, data, sizeof(data));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *val = (data[0] << 4) | (data[1] & 0xF);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t rn5t618_adc_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct rn5t618_adc_data *adc = data;
> > + unsigned int r = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* clear low & high threshold irqs */
> > + regmap_write(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_IR_ADC1, 0);
> > + regmap_write(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_IR_ADC2, 0);
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_IR_ADC3, &r);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + dev_err(adc->dev, "failed to read IRQ status: %d\n", ret);
> > +
> > + regmap_write(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_IR_ADC3, 0);
> > +
> > + if (r & ADCEND_IRQ)
> > + complete(&adc->conv_completion);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rn5t618_adc_read(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> > + const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> > + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > + struct rn5t618_adc_data *adc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > + u16 raw;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* select channel */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_ADCCNT3,
> > + ADCCNT3_CHANNEL_MASK,
> > + chan->channel);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_write(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_EN_ADCIR3, ADCEND_IRQ);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_ADCCNT3,
> > + ADCCNT3_AVG,
> > + mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_AVERAGE_RAW ?
> > + ADCCNT3_AVG : 0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + init_completion(&adc->conv_completion);
> > + /* single conversion */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(adc->rn5t618->regmap, RN5T618_ADCCNT3,
> > + ADCCNT3_GODONE, ADCCNT3_GODONE);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&adc->conv_completion,
> > + RN5T618_ADC_CONVERSION_TIMEOUT);
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + dev_warn(adc->dev, "timeout waiting for adc result\n");
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = rn5t618_read_adc_reg(adc->rn5t618,
> > + RN5T618_ILIMDATAH + 2 * chan->channel,
> > + &raw);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *val = raw;
> > + if (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)
> > + *val = *val * REFERENCE_VOLT *
> > + rn5t618_ratios[chan->channel].numerator /
> > + rn5t618_ratios[chan->channel].denominator / 4095;
>
> This info should be provided as scale so that userspace can do the maths if
> it wants to rather than handling it in kernel.
>
can do as has to do? So I guess any simple shell script then cannot simply
read out values from sysfs.
Hmm, how is scale defined here?
processed in mV = raw * scale (which can be IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL)?
> > +
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_info rn5t618_adc_iio_info = {
> > + .read_raw = &rn5t618_adc_read,
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define RN5T618_ADC_CHANNEL(_channel, _type, _name) { \
> > + .type = _type, \
> > + .channel = _channel, \
> > + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> > + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_AVERAGE_RAW) | \
> > + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED), \
>
> Sorry, I missed this before.
>
> As a general rule it makes no sense to expose both RAW and PROCESSED values.
> It should be possible to work one out from the other if the relationship is
> linear and scale is provided.
>
hmm, the other adc drivers, I get in touch with, expose both RAW and PROCESSED.
like twl4030_madc. So you want to not have that for new drivers and from the
previous comment you prefer to have PROCESSED dropped here?
Regards,
Andreas
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists