lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:36:11 +0100
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     Michael Stapelberg <michael+lkml@...pelberg.ch>
Cc:     fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kyle Sanderson <kyle.leet@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Still a pretty bad time on 5.4.6 with fuse_request_end.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:38 AM Michael Stapelberg
<michael+lkml@...pelberg.ch> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately not: when I change the code like so:
>
>     bool async;
>     uint32_t opcode_early = req->args->opcode;
>
>     if (test_and_set_bit(FR_FINISHED, &req->flags))
>         goto put_request;
>
>     async = req->args->end;
>
> …gdb only reports:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x000000a700000001 in ?? ()
> #1  0xffffffff8137fc99 in fuse_copy_finish (cs=0x20000ffffffff) at
> fs/fuse/dev.c:681
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> But maybe that’s a hint in and of itself?

Yep, it's a stack use after return bug.   Attached patch should fix
it, though I haven't tested it.

Thanks,
Miklos

View attachment "fuse-fix-stack-use-after-return.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1488 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists