linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 0/9] tracing vs rcu vs nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:01:39 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] tracing vs rcu vs nmi

Hi all,

These here patches are the result of Mathieu and Steve trying to get commit
865e63b04e9b2 ("tracing: Add back in rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for rcuidle
tracepoints") reverted again.

One of the things discovered is that tracing MUST NOT happen before nmi_enter()
or after nmi_exit(). Audit results of the previous version are still valid.

Changes since -v1:

 - Added tags
 - Changed #4; changed nmi_enter() to use __preempt_count_add() vs
   marking preempt_count_add() notrace.
 - Changed #5; confusion on which functions are notrace due to Makefile
 - Added #9; remove limitation on the perf-function-trace coupling