linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use 18-bit DP if we can

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:04:30 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use 18-bit DP if we can

Andrzej / Neil,

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:21 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Andrzej / Neil,
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 3:37 PM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 18 Dec 14:35 PST 2019, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > > The current bridge driver always forced us to use 24 bits per pixel
> > > over the DP link.  This is a waste if you are hooked up to a panel
> > > that only supports 6 bits per color or fewer, since in that case you
> > > ran run at 18 bits per pixel and thus end up at a lower DP clock rate.
> >
> > s/ran/can/
>
> I'm going to make the assumption that you can fix this typo when
> applying the patch and I'm not planning to send a v4.  If that's not a
> good assumption then please yell.

With -rc1 released, it seems like it might be a nice time to land this
series.  Do you happen to know if there is anything outstanding?  Is
one of you two the right person to land this series, or should I be
asking someone else?  I can see if I can find someone to take them
through drm-misc if there's nobody else?

It's not massively crazy urgent or anything, but the patches have been
floating for quite some time now and it'd be nice to know what the
plan was.  I also have another patch I'd like to post up but was
hoping to get this series resolved first.

Thanks much!

-Doug