linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:08 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle

Quoting Taniya Das (2019-12-09 20:47:35)
> Hi Brian,
> 
> On 12/5/2019 5:54 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
> > +     d_reg_val = mask - (((mask - 17) * duty->num) / duty->den);
> > +     ret = __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, rcg->freq_tbl,
> > +                                                d_reg_val, duty->num,
> > +                                                duty->den);
> 
> The duty-cycle calculation is not accurate.
> There is already a plan to submit the duty-cycle changes from my side.

What are the plans to submit this? Should we expect to see this support
in the next week? Month?