linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 27/28] tools/cgroup: make slabinfo.py compatible with new slab controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200212052124.GA12769@in.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:51:24 +0530
From:   Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 27/28] tools/cgroup: make slabinfo.py compatible with
 new slab controller

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:24:58PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 07:47:29AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:34:52AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> 
> Btw, I've checked that the change like you've done above fixes the problem.
> The script works for me both on current upstream and new_slab.2 branch.
> 
> Are you sure that in your case there is some kernel memory charged to that
> cgroup? Please note, that in the current implementation kmem_caches are created
> on demand, so the accounting is effectively enabled with some delay.

I do see kmem getting charged.

# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/1/memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/1/memory.usage_in_bytes
182910976
4515627008

> Below is an updated version of the patch to use:

I see the below failure with this updated version:

# ./tools/cgroup/slabinfo-new.py /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/1
# name            <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail>
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/drgn", line 11, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/drgn/internal/cli.py", line 127, in main
    runpy.run_path(args.script[0], init_globals=init_globals, run_name="__main__")
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 263, in run_path
    pkg_name=pkg_name, script_name=fname)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 96, in _run_module_code
    mod_name, mod_spec, pkg_name, script_name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
    exec(code, run_globals)
  File "./tools/cgroup/slabinfo-new.py", line 158, in <module>
    main()
  File "./tools/cgroup/slabinfo-new.py", line 153, in main
    memcg.kmem_caches.address_of_(),
AttributeError: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member 'kmem_caches'

> +
> +def main():
> +    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=DESC,
> +                                     formatter_class=
> +                                     argparse.RawTextHelpFormatter)
> +    parser.add_argument('cgroup', metavar='CGROUP',
> +                        help='Target memory cgroup')
> +    args = parser.parse_args()
> +
> +    try:
> +        cgroup_id = stat(args.cgroup).st_ino
> +        find_memcg_ids()
> +        memcg = MEMCGS[cgroup_id]
> +    except KeyError:
> +        err('Can\'t find the memory cgroup')
> +
> +    cfg = detect_kernel_config()
> +
> +    print('# name            <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab>'
> +          ' : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor>'
> +          ' : slabdata <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail>')
> +
> +    for s in list_for_each_entry('struct kmem_cache',
> +                                 memcg.kmem_caches.address_of_(),
> +                                 'memcg_params.kmem_caches_node'):

Are you sure this is the right version? In the previous version
you had the if-else loop that handled shared_slab_pages and old
scheme separately.

Regards,
Bharata.