linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] net: qrtr: Add MHI transport layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fbcaa0e-cb94-ba8b-42da-379df3a7a1ce@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:01:17 -0800
From:   Chris Lew <clew@...eaurora.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        arnd@...db.de, smohanad@...eaurora.org, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        hemantk@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] net: qrtr: Add MHI transport layer


On 2/10/2020 7:50 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:14:19PM -0800, Chris Lew wrote:
>> On 2/4/2020 12:19 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:12:25AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:20:07 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>>> +/* From QRTR to MHI */
>>>>> +static void qcom_mhi_qrtr_ul_callback(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
>>>>> +				      struct mhi_result *mhi_res)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	struct qrtr_mhi_dev *qdev = dev_get_drvdata(&mhi_dev->dev);
>>>>> +	struct qrtr_mhi_pkt *pkt;
>>>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&qdev->ul_lock, flags);
>>>>> +	pkt = list_first_entry(&qdev->ul_pkts, struct qrtr_mhi_pkt, node);
>>>>> +	list_del(&pkt->node);
>>>>> +	complete_all(&pkt->done);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	kref_put(&pkt->refcount, qrtr_mhi_pkt_release);
>>>> Which kref_get() does this pair with?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like qcom_mhi_qrtr_send() will release a reference after
>>>> completion, too.
>>>>
>>> Yikes, there is some issue here...
>>>
>>> Acutally the issue is not in what you referred above but the overall kref
>>> handling itself. Please see below.
>>>
>>> kref_put() should be present in qcom_mhi_qrtr_ul_callback() as it will
>>> decrement the refcount which got incremented in qcom_mhi_qrtr_send(). It
>>> should be noted that kref_init() will fix the refcount to 1 and kref_get() will
>>> increment to 2. So for properly releasing the refcount to 0, we need to call
>>> kref_put() twice.
>>>
>>> So if all goes well, the refcount will get decremented twice in
>>> qcom_mhi_qrtr_ul_callback() as well as in qcom_mhi_qrtr_send() and we are good.
>>>
>>> But, if the transfer has failed ie., when qcom_mhi_qrtr_ul_callback() doesn't
>>> get called, then we are leaking the refcount. I need to rework the kref handling
>>> code in next iteration.
>>>
>>> Thanks for triggering this!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mani
>>>
>>>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qdev->ul_lock, flags);
>>>>> +}
>> Hi Mani,
>>
>> I'm not sure if this was changed in your patches but MHI is supposed to give a
>> ul_callback() for any packet that is successfully queued. In the case of the
>> transfer failing, the ul_callback() should still be called so there should
>> be no refcount leaking. It is an essential assumption I made, if that no longer
>> holds true then the entire driver needs to be reworked.
>>
> Your assumption is correct. Only when the packet gets queued into the transfer
> ring, the ul_xfer_cb will be called irrespective of the transfer state (success
> or failure). But when the mhi_queue_transfer() returns even before queuing any
> packet, then we need to decrease the refcount in the error path.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.

The error path for mhi_queue_transfer directly frees the packet structure since no
other context has a reference to those structs. If you wanted to clean it up and converge
using kref release to free, I think that would work. There are some things you'll have to
re-arrange like at what point the packet is added to the ul pkts list.

> Thanks,
> Mani
>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project