[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66566792-58a4-bf65-6723-7d2887c84160@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:31:32 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] eventfd: add EFD_AUTORESET flag
On 29/01/20 18:20, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> + /* Semaphore semantics don't make sense when autoreset is enabled */
> + if ((flags & EFD_SEMAPHORE) && (flags & EFD_AUTORESET))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
I think they do, you just want to subtract 1 instead of setting the
count to 0. This way, writing 1 would be the post operation on the
semaphore, while poll() would be the wait operation.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists